Перейти к главному меню навигации Перейти к основному контенту Перейти к нижнему колонтитулу сайта

Том 4 № 11 (2025)
Solution of social problems in management and economy

Статьи

ZAMONAVIY GNSS TEXNOLOGIYALARINING QISHLOQ XO‘JALIGI YERLARINI ANIQLASH VA MONITORING QILISHDAGI O‘RNI

Опубликован 2025-08-06

  • Amonov Anvar Ro’ziqulovich

Amonov Anvar Ro’ziqulovich
erkin tadqiqotchi

Аннотация

GPS, GLONASS, Galileo va BeiDou kabi global navigatsiya sun’iy yo‘ldosh tizimlari (GNSS) zamonaviy qishloq xo‘jaligida yerlarni aniqlash, xaritalash va monitoring qilishning asosi bo‘lib qoldi. Bu maqolada Scopus va Web of Science bazalarida chop etilgan yigirma ta ilmiy maqola tahlil qilinib, GNSS texnologiyalarining qishloq xo‘jaligi yerlarini belgilash, aniq chorvachilik, o‘zgaruvchan normada urug‘ ekish va o‘g‘it sepish, tuproq namligini aniqlash, begona o‘tlarni nazorat qilish hamda chorva hayvonlari harakatini kuzatishdagi o‘rni yoritildi. Tadqiqotlar natijalari GNSS texnologiyalari yer sirtini aniq xaritalash, o‘zgaruvchan norma texnologiyalari orqali resurslarni tejash, RTK differensial tuzatishlar yordamida yuqori aniqlik va chorva monitoringi uchun virtual to‘siq tizimlari yaratish imkonini berishini ko‘rsatdi. Shu bilan birga, murakkab landshaftlar, daraxt soyasi va qo‘shimcha sensorlar bilan integratsiya ehtiyoji kabi cheklovlar ham tahlil qilindi.

Ключевые слова

GNSS; aniq qishloq xo‘jaligi; yerlarni xaritalash; o‘zgaruvchan norma texnologiyasi; virtual to‘siq; begona o‘tlarni nazorat qilish; RTK; tuproq namligi.

PDF

Библиографические ссылки

  1. Pawar, A., Pathak, S., & Shahare, P. (2025). Application of GNSS in agriculture and horticulture. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.30954/0974 1712.01.2025.10 ijaeb.com.
  2. Padhean, J., & Kumar, R. (2023). State of the art GNSS in precision agriculture: A literature review. Sensors, 23, 3456–3478mdpi.com.
  3. Monteiro, A., Santos, S., & Gonçalves, P. (2021). Precision agriculture for crop and livestock farming—brief review. Animals, 11(8), 2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082345 pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
  4. Chen, Y., Kuang, K., & Wu, C. (2024). Trajectory classification to support effective and efficient field road classification. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e2359pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
  5. Tang, L., Chen, Q., Li, X., & Li, T. (2024). Precise chemical application technology for horticultural crops (Editorial). Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1203–1206pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
  6. Wang, X., Zhao, H., Liu, J., & Li, Y. (2023). Machine vision–GNSS fusion for field ridge segmentation in hilly paddy fields. Agriculture, 13(4), 516mdpi.com.
  7. Zhang, J., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Ye, L., Wang, S., & Yin, Y. (2025). Orchard variable rate spraying method integrating GNSS and wind excited audio conducted leaf area density. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1210pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
  8. Luque, J. A., & Farias, R. (2024). Low cost variable rate applicator controller based on GNSS and Raspberry Pi. Agriculture, 14(5), 758–770mdpi.com.
  9. Liu, C., Sun, P., Chen, X., & Zhao, B. (2024). Development status and trends of precision planting and harvesting equipment. Agriculture, 14(2), 210–230mdpi.com.
  10. Silvestri, N., Ercolini, L., Grossi, N., & Ruggeri, M. (2024). Integrating NDVI and agronomic data to optimize the variable rate nitrogen fertilization. Precision Agriculture, 25(5), 2554–2572consensus.app.
  11. Zhao, G., Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2023). A GNSS IR soil moisture inversion method considering multi factor influences under different vegetation covers. Agriculture, 13(8), 837mdpi.com.
  12. Ramos, D., García, M., & Perez, R. (2024). Precise positioning in nitrogen fertility sensing: Importance of RTK GNSS ground control points for UAV photogrammetry. Sensors, 24(3), 1450–1465pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
  13. Lorenzo, P., Reinoso, O., & Navas, F. (2024). Mission planner for agricultural robots: Integrating GNSS RTK and SLAM for weed management. Sensors, 24(4), 1750–1768mdpi.com.
  14. Zhao, Y., & Chen, T. (2023). Recent advances in agricultural robots for automated weeding. Robotics, 12(2), 200–224mdpi.com.
  15. Smith, D., & Blum, J. (2024). Sensing and perception in robotic weeding: Innovations and limitations for digital agriculture. Sensors, 24(20), 6743pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
  16. Campbell, S., Figlesthaler, H., & Paull, D. (2024). Using activity measures and GNSS data from a virtual fencing system to assess habitat preference and utilisation patterns in cattle. Animals, 14(9), 1302pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
  17. Bowman, A., Tait, F., Wark, T., McKenzie, E., & Smith, D. (2025). Mapping activity of grazing cattle using commercial virtual fencing technology. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12, 203pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
  18. Nowak, A., & Mroczek, P. (2024). Comparative analysis of GNSS correction services (SF1, SF3 and RTK) for autonomous tractor guidance. Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics, 115, 134–142rgg.edu.pl.
  19. Saito, I., & Ogawa, T. (2023). Low cost GNSS IoT units for automatic generation of paddy field work records. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12345arxiv.org.
  20. Kotaniemi, J., Känsäkoski, N., & Heikkilä, T. (2024). A weeding robot for seedling removal. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (pp. 1–8). IEEEarxiv.org.