ORGANIZATION OF ENGLISH SPEECH ETIQUETTE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7883268Keywords:
speech etiquette , forms of communication, Uzbek and English cultures, communicative behaviour.Abstract
In order to fully understand the tasks, significance, and places of their use of speech etiquette units, it is necessary to use the theoretical conclusions of sociolinguistics, paralinguistics, and linguopragmatics related to speech etiquette.
References
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining «Oliy ta’lim tizimini yanada rivojlantirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida»gi PQ-2909-son Qarori. – Toshkent, 2017 yil 20 aprel.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Konstitutsiyasi. 2 bo‘lim. 5 bob. 18-modda.
Zdravomislova Ye.A., Temkina A.A. Sotsialnoe konstruirovanie gendera: feministskaya teoriya. Vvedenie v gendernie issledovaniya. CHast 1. Uchebnoe posobie. Pod red. Jerebkinoy. – Xarkov: XGTSI. «ALETEYYa», SPb., 2001. – S. 9-16.
Zemskaya Ye. A., Kitaygorodskaya M. V., Rozanova N. N. Osobennosti mujskoy i jenskoy rechi // Russkiy yazik v yego funktsionirovanii: kommunikativno-pragmaticheskiy aspekt. – M.: Nauka, 1993. – S. 90-136.
Kostomarov V.T. Russkiy rechevoy etiket. – Russkiy yazik za rubejom. 1967. №1. – 62 s.
Mahmudov N. Presuppozitsiya va gap // O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti. 1986, 6-son. – B. 28-31.
Mahmudov N. Nutqning jo‘yaliligi // O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti, 2007. 3-son. – B. 13-17.
Mahmudov N. Tilning mukammal tadqiqi yo‘llarini izlab...// O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti, 2012. 5-son. – B. 3-16.
Mahmudov N. Ziddiyat va ma’no taraqqiyoti // O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti. 2014. 3-son. – B.16-24.
Nikolaeva T.M., Uspenskiy B.A. Retsenzii o novix rabotax paralingvistiki. // Voprosi yazikoznaniya. – M., 1965. №6. – S. 118-122.
Lola Uzakova, 15 December 2021, Comparative Study of Uzbek and English Speech Etiquette-PINDUS Journal of Culture, Literature, and ELT (PJCLE) p. 60- 63
Grice, Herbert P. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.). Semantics, 3, Speech Acts, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
