THE IMPACT OF TOURISM REVENUES ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES.

Authors

  • Boburbek Khakimov Senior lecturer, Oriental University, Tashkent
  • Muazzam Khakimova Student, Uzbekistan State World Languages University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15038663

Keywords:

Tourism, tourism revenues, GDP, economic growth, GLS, robust standard errors regression, empirical analysis.

Abstract

This research examines the empirical relationship between tourism revenues and economic growth rates. To carry out this study, data on the share of tourism revenues in GDP and GDP growth rates for Central Asian countries from 2000 to 2021 were obtained from the World Bank database. Due to the heteroscedasticity problem in the GLS regression, the regression with robust standard errors was used. The results showed a strong positive relationship between the two indicators, specifically that a 1% change in tourism revenues corresponds to a 0.5% change in GDP growth.

References

Chiara, O. D., & D'Alfonso, T. (2015). Tourism and economic growth: A review of empirical

literature. Journal of Economic Development, 40(3), 1-24.

Fayissa, B., Nsiah, C., & Tadasse, B. (2011). The impact of tourism on economic growth and

development in Africa. Tourism Economics, 17(6), 1369-1391.

Kim, H., & Chen, M. H. (2018). The impact of tourism on economic growth: Evidence from

the Asia-Pacific region. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 23(1), 17-28.

Ribeiro, R. S., Gonçalves, P., & Coelho, A. (2019). Tourism and economic growth in Brazil:

Evidence from a panel data analysis. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, 36(1), 1-19.

UNWTO. (2021). UNWTO world tourism barometer. World Tourism Organization. Retrieved from https://www.unwto.org/tourism-barometer

Downloads

Published

2025-03-17

How to Cite

Khakimov, B., & Khakimova, M. (2025). THE IMPACT OF TOURISM REVENUES ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES. Solution of Social Problems in Management and Economy, 4(3), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15038663