CODE-SWITCHING IN YOUTH SPEECH: A SOCIOLINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Muhayyo Ziyayeva Uzbekistan State World Languages University Department of Thereotical Aspects of English Language
  • Mardona Karimbayeva Faculty of Foreign Language and Literature English Language Faculty 3, Group :2402

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18321515

Keywords:

code-switching, youth speech, bilingualism, sociolinguistics, language and identity

Abstract

Code-switching, the alternation between two or more languages within a single conversation or utterance, has become a prominent feature of youth speech in multilingual societies. This phenomenon is especially visible among young people who are exposed to multiple languages through education, media, and social networks. The present article examines code-switching in youth speech from a sociolinguistic perspective, focusing on its functions, motivations, and social meanings. Rather than viewing code-switching as a sign of linguistic deficiency, this paper argues that it is a strategic and meaningful practice that reflects identity construction, group membership, and communicative efficiency. The article also discusses the role of globalization, digital communication, and educational environments in intensifying code-switching among young speakers. By analyzing the social factors that influence language choice, this study highlights the importance of recognizing code-switching as a natural and systematic aspect of bilingual and multilingual communication among youth.

References

https://uz.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sotsiologiya

https://uz.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sotsiolingvistika

https://zenodo.org/records/10035789

Usmanova Sh., Bekmuxammedova N., Iskandarova N. “Sotsiolingvistika”. Toshkent: “Universitet”, 2014-yil, 4-bet

Oxford introduction to language study .Series editor H.G.Widdowson

Sociolinguistics . Bernard Spolsky

Downloads

Published

2026-01-20

How to Cite

Ziyayeva, M., & Karimbayeva, M. (2026). CODE-SWITCHING IN YOUTH SPEECH: A SOCIOLINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE. Models and Methods in Modern Science, 5(1), 64-66. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18321515