RESTRICTIONS ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH TO ENSURE PUBLIC ORDER

Authors

  • Iroda Nizamova Master’s student of the Tashkent State University of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11243758

Keywords:

freedom of speech, public order, International covenant on civil and political rights, European convention on human rights, European court of human rights, hate speech, incitement to violence, extremist propaganda, legal framework, proportionality, social media regulation, fake news, democratic society.

Abstract

The article delves into the intricate balance between upholding freedom of speech and maintaining public order. While freedom of expression is a fundamental human right enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights, it is not absolute. The author explores Article 19 of the ICCPR, which allows for restrictions on freedom of speech under specific conditions. The article analyzes landmark cases from the European Court of Human Rights that illustrate the Court’s approach to differentiating permissible restrictions based on the nature and impact of the speech. It further examines the challenges posed by modern communication technologies, particularly the Internet, in regulating harmful content while avoiding undue censorship. The study underscores the necessity for a clear legal framework, legitimate aims, and proportionality in any restriction on freedom of speech, highlighting the role of social media companies in mitigating the spread of harmful information without stifling free expression.

References

• The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI)

• URL: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

• The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI)

• URL: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

• What is hate speech? - URL: https://www.un.org/en/hate-speech/understanding-hate-speech/what-is-hate-speech

• Jersild v. Denmark. - URL: https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/jersild-v-denmark/

• Erbakan v. Turkey. - URL: https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/laws/ecthr-erbakan-v-turkey-no-5940500-07062006/

• Protecting the right to freedom of expression under the European convention on human rights. - URL: https://rm.coe.int/handbook-freedom-of-expression-eng/1680732814

• Leroy v. France. - URL: https://base.garant.ru/12167519/

• О flavus and others v. Russia. - URL: https://mmdc.ru/praktika_evropejskogo_suda/praktika_po_st10_evropejskoj_konvencii/ooo-flavus-i-drugie-protiv-rossii-ooo-flavus-and-others-v-russia/

• Restricting Freedom of Expression: Standards and Principles. - URL: http://www.law-democracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/10.03.Paper-on-Restrictions-on-FOE.pdf

• Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Limited. - URL: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-18/18

Downloads

Published

2024-05-21

How to Cite

Nizamova, I. (2024). RESTRICTIONS ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH TO ENSURE PUBLIC ORDER. Academic Research in Modern Science, 3(19), 111-115. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11243758