INNOVATIVE DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES FOR TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES TO NON-PHILOLOGICAL SPECIALTIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors

  • Umidаbegim Аnvаrоvа PhD Student, Bukhаrа Stаte Pedаgоgicаl Institute, Bukhаrа, Uzbekistаn

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16886289

Keywords:

Differentiated instruction, foreign language acquisition, higher education, non-linguistic students, learner adaptation, technology-assisted learning, professional context.

Abstract

The growing demand for foreign language proficiency among non-philological specialists necessitates the development of effective and adaptive teaching strategies. This article explores innovative approaches to differentiated instruction in higher education, focusing on the needs of students from non-linguistic fields. It reviews theoretical foundations, outlines modern methodological tools, and discusses practical models for integrating professional context into language instruction. Emphasis is placed on technology-assisted learning, individualized task design, and collaborative project-based activities. The findings highlight that differentiated teaching fosters learner motivation, supports professional skill development, and ensures equitable access to language education.

References

Tomlinson, C. A. “How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms”. ASCD, 2017

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Routledge, 2010

Basturkmen, H. “Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes”. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. “How Languages are Learned” (5th ed.). Oxford University Press, 2021

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. “Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach”. Cambridge University Press, 1998

Downloads

Published

2025-08-15

How to Cite

Аnvаrоvа U. (2025). INNOVATIVE DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES FOR TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES TO NON-PHILOLOGICAL SPECIALTIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Theoretical Aspects in the Formation of Pedagogical Sciences, 4(21), 127-129. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16886289