TIL O‘ZGARUVCHANLIGI VA TEJAMKORLIK TAMOYILLARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16750531Keywords:
so‘zlashuv nutqi, til tizimi, fonetik eroziya, grammatik soddalashuv, variantlik, norma.Abstract
Mazkur maqolada so‘zlashuv nutqining til tizimidagi o‘zgarishlarga ta’siri yoritiladi. So‘zlashuv shaklining til dinamikasiga ta’siri fonetik eroziya, yordamchi so‘zlarning assimilyatsiyalanishi, grammatik soddalashuv, variantlik va normaga munosabat kabi hodisalar orqali tahlil etiladi,shuningdek, og‘zaki nutqdagi o‘zgarishlar zamonaviy lingvistik yondashuvlar asosida sharhlanib, umumiy til tizimidagi o‘rni ochib beriladi.
References
Bloomfield L. Language. / L.Bloomfield. – New York: Henry Holt, 1933. – 386 p.
Campbell, Lyle. Historical linguistics. The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1998. – 419 p.
Haugen E. Social factors of sound change. // Proceedings of the IX - th International Congress of
Haugen, E. Phonetic Sciences. Copenhagen, 1980. – Vol. III. – P. 222-237.
Hawkins, S., Midgley, J. Formant Frequencies of RP Monophthongs in Four Age Groups of Speakers // Journal of the International Phonetic Association. – Cambridge Univ. Press,Vol. 35., No.2. December, 2005. P. 183–199.
Iriskulov M.T., Shatunova A.S. “English Phonetics”. Uzbekistan State University of World languages. Tashkent. 2011. – C.62-75.
Labov W., Yeager M., Steiner R. A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Report on National Science Foundation Grant GS – 3287. /
Leech, G. ‘Modality on the move: the English modal auxiliaries 1961-1992’, in Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug and Frank Palmer (eds.) Modality in Contemporary English, Topics in English Linguistics 44.Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter, - 2003.
Martinet A. Économie des changements phonétiques. Berne: Éditions A. Francke S. A., 1955. - 396 p.
N. V. Tatsenko. Introduction to Theoretical Phonetics of English: study guide. – Sumy : Sumy State University, 2020. – P.113-114.
Wolf H. Sprachwandel in soziolinguistischerSicht. // Germanistische Linguistik. / H. Wolf. – Olms. Ахренова Н. А. Лингвистические особенности микроблогов // Альманах современной науки и образования. 2011. №9(52). – C.120. 12.Sulaymonbekovna, Q. N. (2021). COGNITIVE DISSONANCE AND PRAGMATIC INFLUENCE, ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 902-908. 13.Kobilova, N. S. (2016). LITERARY INTERPRETATION OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN THE NOVEL" MARTIN EDEN". Worldscience, 5 (3 (7)), 52-53. 14.Sulaymonovna, Q. N., & Abduxoloqovna, R. M. (2023, May). STRUCTURE OF THE LINGUISTIC CATEGORY" CHARACTERISTICS OF A HUMAN". In Integration Conference on Integration of Pragmalinguistic s, Functional Translation Studies and Language Teaching Processes (pp. 151-153). 15.Sulaymonbekovna, Q. N., & Raimovna, I. G. (2021). Cognitive dissonance and pragmatic influence. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(10), 902-908. 16.Nazarova, N. (2022). Лингвистическое исследование антропонимов в лексической системе. Центр научных публикаций (buxdu. Uz), 13, 13. 17.Nazarova, N. (2022). Обучение молодых учащихся через интерактивные игры. ЦЕНТР НАУЧНЫХ ПУБЛИКАЦИЙ (buxdu. Uz), 7(7). 18.Ahrorovna, N. N. (2023). Analyses of Anthroponyms in the Novel “The Godfather”. American Journal of Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education (2993-2769), 1(10), 523-526. 19.Ahrorovna, N. N. (2023). ANTROPONIMLAR MOHIYATI VA SEMANTIK TAHLILI. SCIENTIFIC ASPECTS AND TRENDS IN THE FIELD OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, 1(10), 160-163. 20.Ahrorovna, N. N. (2022). Semantic Properties of Anthroponyms. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies, 18. 21.Nazarova, N. (2022). Лексико-семантические особенности антропонимов. Центр научных публикаций (buxdu. Uz), 25, 25. 22.Ahrorovna, N. N. (2022). STUDY OF ANTHROPONYMS AND THEIR PLACES IN THE LEXICAL SYSTEM. Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal, 3 (1), 90-96.
