MEASURES TO INCREASE THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CENTRALIZING CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY ANALYSES AT THE LEVEL OF FAMILY POLYCLINICS

Authors

  • Orifjon Aripov Head of the Department of the Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory of the Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers
  • Ilkhom Toshev Senior Lecturer of the Department of Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory at the Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers
  • Mukhammad Sodiq Khojimurodov Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers Department of Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory 2nd year basic doctoral student

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Abstract

Up to one-third of medical errors are linked to diagnostic errors, making them the third most common cause of death in the US. According to estimates from extensive observational studies of the US population, one in twenty persons may experience a diagnostic error at some point in their lives, according to a 2014 study by Singh et al. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, a report released in 2015 by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), formerly known as the Institute of Medicine, emphasized the urgent need to recognize and correct flaws in the diagnostic process. For the purposes of this manuscript, diagnostic excellence is defined as a systems-level state that successfully combines medical knowledge, expertise, and resources to continuously and quantifiably improve diagnoses and lower the risk or occurrence of diagnostic errors while still meeting the needs of patients and health systems as a whole [1,2,3]. 

References

1.Sharp CA, Bresnen M, Austin L, McCarthy J, Dixon WG, Sanders C. Implementing disruptive technological change in UK healthcare: exploring development of a smart phone app for remote patient monitoring as a boundary object using qualitative methods. J Health Organ Manag. 2021;35(2):141–59.

2.Haring M, Freigang F, Amelung V, Gersch M. What can healthcare systems learn from looking at tensions in innovation processes? A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1299.

3.Göttgens I, Oertelt-Prigione S. The application of Human-Centered design approaches in health research and innovation: A narrative review of current practices. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(12):e28102.

4.Han, GR., Goncharov, A., Eryilmaz, M. et al. Machine learning in point-of-care testing: innovations, challenges, and opportunities. Nat Commun 16, 3165 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58527-6

5.Cocker, D. et al. Healthcare as a driver, reservoir and amplifier of antimicrobial resistance: opportunities for interventions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 636–649 (2024).

6.Wiemken, T. L. & Kelley, R. R. Machine Learning in Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research. Annu. Rev. Public Health. 41, 21–36 (2020).

7.Tolley, A., Bansal, A., Murerwa, R. & Dicks, J. H. Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care diagnostics for AMR: a systematic review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 79, 1248–1269 (2024).

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13

How to Cite

Aripov , O., Toshev, I., & Khojimurodov, M. S. (2026). MEASURES TO INCREASE THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CENTRALIZING CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY ANALYSES AT THE LEVEL OF FAMILY POLYCLINICS. Models and Methods in Modern Science, 5(9), 101-103. https://doi.org/10.5281/