THE “I-AM” CONCEPT IN P.T. RAJU’S COMPARATIVE ANTHROPOLOGY

Authors

  • Alimardon Mustafaev Lecturer of the National Pedagogical University of Uzbekistan named after Nizami, Researcher of the Tashkent state university of oriental studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Keywords:

P.T.Raju, comparative philosophy, philosophical anthropology, selfhood, personhood, I-Am concept, ātman, Brahman, intercultural dialogue.

Abstract

This article examines the concept of “I-Am” as one of the central elements of P. T. Raju’s comparative philosophical anthropology. The study analyzes the philosophical foundations of this concept, its relationship to the Indian doctrine of ātman–Brahman, and its dialogue with Western conceptions of selfhood and personhood. Particular attention is given to Raju’s attempt to synthesize Eastern metaphysical spirituality and Western rational personalism within a unified anthropological framework. It is argued that the “I-Am” concept serves as a methodological and philosophical bridge between cultures, providing a basis for intercultural dialogue and a universal understanding of human nature. The article concludes that Raju’s theory remains relevant for contemporary comparative philosophy and philosophical anthropology.

References

1. Raju P. T. The Concept of Man: A Study in Comparative Philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin, 1960.

2. Raju P. T. Introduction to Comparative Philosophy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1962.

3. Raju P. T. The Philosophical Traditions of India. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1971.

4. Raju P. T. Structural Depths of Indian Thought. Albany: SUNY Press, 1985.

5. Radhakrishnan S. An Idealist View of Life. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1932.

6. Halbfass W. India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding. Albany: SUNY Press, 1988.

7. Panikkar R. The Intrareligious Dialogue. New York: Paulist Press, 1978.

8. Mall R. A. Intercultural Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.

9. Mohanty J. N. Classical Indian Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.

10. Gupta B. The Disinterested Witness: A Fragment of Advaita Vedānta Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1998.

11. Deutsch E. Advaita Vedanta: A Philosophical Reconstruction. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1969.

12. King R. Indian Philosophy: An Introduction to Hindu and Buddhist Thought. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

Mustafaev, A. (2026). THE “I-AM” CONCEPT IN P.T. RAJU’S COMPARATIVE ANTHROPOLOGY. Current Approaches and New Research in Modern Sciences, 5(9), 23-26. https://doi.org/10.5281/