ADMINISTRATIVE-LEGAL REGULATION OF THE CIVIL SERVICE IN UZBEKISTAN: REFORM ANALYSIS AND EFFECTIVENESS

Authors

  • Diyora Nurmuxamedova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16528096

Abstract

Uzbekistan has embarked on significant civil service reforms in recent years as part of a broader modernization and anti-corruption agenda. A milestone was the adoption of the Law of 8 August 2022 No. ZRU-788 “On Civil Service,” which took effect in November 2022. This new law establishes the legal framework for the state civil service, introducing merit-based principles, ethical standards, and institutional mechanisms to professionalize public administration. The reforms aim to create a modern, efficient civil service that operates with integrity and transparency, aligning with international standards that call for meritocracy and accountability in public service. This thesis analyzes the key legislative reforms regulating Uzbekistan’s civil service – especially the 2022 Law on Civil Service – and evaluates their effectiveness in terms of transparency, professionalization, and depoliticization. Comparisons will be drawn with selected international practices to assess how Uzbekistan’s reforms measure up to global principles of good governance.

References

Laws and Regulations

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Electronic Government" (No. ZRU-395, 2015).

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Administrative Procedures" (No. ZRU-457, 2018).

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Openness of the Activities of State Authorities and Management" (2014).

Regulation on the Single Portal of Interactive Public Services (SPIPS) of Uzbekistan (2013, updated 2021).

European Union. (2014). Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (eIDAS Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union.

European Union. (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Open Data Directive). Official Journal of the European Union.

Institutional Reports

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024). E-Government Survey 2024: The Future of Digital Government. New York: UNDESA.

OECD. (2014). Recommendation on Digital Government Strategies. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2020). Digital Government Review of Sweden: Towards a Data-driven Public Sector. OECD Digital Government Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing.

World Bank. (2022). GovTech Maturity Index: Assessing Digital Transformation in the Public Sector. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

Academic Sources

Castelnovo, W. (2013). A stakeholder based approach to public value creation in e-government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(4), 306–327.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Chan, F.K.Y., & Hu, P.J.H. (2012). Managing Citizens’ Trust in e-Government: A Study of Government-to-Citizen (G2C) Transactions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(4), 191–224.

Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2020). Administration by algorithm: Public management meets public sector automation. Information Polity, 25(4), 443–458.

Gil-Garcia, J.R., Dawes, S.S., & Pardo, T.A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646..

Downloads

Published

2025-07-28

How to Cite

Nurmuxamedova, D. (2025). ADMINISTRATIVE-LEGAL REGULATION OF THE CIVIL SERVICE IN UZBEKISTAN: REFORM ANALYSIS AND EFFECTIVENESS. Current Approaches and New Research in Modern Sciences, 4(11), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16528096