STRUCTURAL COMPOSITION OF HYDRONYMS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

Authors

  • Nilufar Majidova Second-year Master’s student in Foreign Language and Literature at TISU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18333639

Keywords:

hydronym, toponymy, structural composition, English, Uzbek, comparative linguistics

Abstract

Hydronyms, as a special class of toponyms denoting water bodies, constitute an important object of linguistic, cultural, and historical research. Their structural composition reflects the interaction of language, geography, and collective cognition over long periods of time. This article presents a comparative analysis of the structural composition of hydronyms in English and Uzbek. The study focuses on morphological, lexical, and syntactic patterns that characterize hydronym formation in both languages. By examining simple, compound, and complex hydronyms, as well as affixal and syntactic models, the paper highlights both universal and language-specific features. The analysis demonstrates that while English hydronyms tend to favor compounding and descriptive lexical elements, Uzbek hydronyms show a strong inclination toward affixation and agglutinative structures. The findings contribute to comparative onomastics and provide a theoretical basis for further hydronymic studies.

References

Dauzat, A. (1926). Les noms de lieux: Origine et évolution. Paris: Delagrave.

Ekwall, E. (1960). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Place-Names. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Superanskaya, A. V. (1973). Obshchaya teoriya imeni sobstvennogo. Moscow: Nauka.

Qorayev, S. (2005). Oʻzbek toponimikasi. Toshkent: Fan.

Hojiyev, A. (2010). Oʻzbek tilining onomastikasi. Toshkent: Akademnashr.

Kilichev, B. E. (2023). Buxoro viloyati toponimlarining lisoniy tadqiqi (Doctoral dissertation). Bukhara

Downloads

Published

2026-01-21

How to Cite

Majidova, N. (2026). STRUCTURAL COMPOSITION OF HYDRONYMS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK. Academic Research in Modern Science, 5(2), 179-182. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18333639