GENERATIV DIZAYNNING AN’ANAVIY LOYIHALASH USULLARIDAN FARQI

Authors

  • Dildora Asatova Toshkent Arxitektura Qurilish Universiteti, Arxitektura fakulteti, Dizayn kafedrasi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17231744

Keywords:

generativ dizayn, an’anaviy loyihalash, ko‘p-mezonli optimallashtirish, evolyutsion algoritmlar, parametrik model, CAD/CAE, DfAM.

Abstract

Ushbu tezisda generativ dizaynning mohiyati va uning an’anaviy loyihalash usullaridan farqli jihatlari tahlil qilinadi. Generativ yondashuv sun’iy intellekt, evolyutsion algoritmlar va ko‘p-mezonli optimallashtirishdan foydalanib, cheklov va maqsad funksiyalariga mos yuzlab variantlarni avtomatik ishlab chiqadi. Natijada qaror qabul qilish jarayoni tezlashadi, resurs sarfi kamayadi va ishlab chiqarishga yaroqli, innovatsion shakllar paydo bo‘ladi. Shu bilan birga, generativ dizaynning cheklovlari — ma’lumot sifati, ishlab chiqarish texnologiyalari (DfAM/DFM) bilan moslashuv, hamda dizayner kompetensiyalariga qo‘yiladigan yangi talablar — ko‘rsatib o‘tiladi.

References

Oxman, R. (2006). Theory and design in the first digital age. Design Studies, 27(3), 229–265.

Turrin, M., von Buelow, P., & Stouffs, R. (2011). Design explorations of performance-driven geometry in architectural design using parametric modeling and genetic algorithms. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(4), 656–675.

Deb, K. (2001). Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley.

Ullman, D. G. (2015). The Mechanical Design Process (5-ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K.-H. (2007). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach (3-ed.). Springer.

Autodesk (2025). Fusion 360 – Generative Design (Official Documentation). (Raqamli qo‘llanma: generativ dizayn prinsiplari, DfAM va ish oqimlari).

Bentley, P. J., & Corne, D. W. (2002). Creative Evolutionary Systems. Morgan Kaufmann.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

How to Cite

Asatova, D. (2025). GENERATIV DIZAYNNING AN’ANAVIY LOYIHALASH USULLARIDAN FARQI. Academic Research in Modern Science, 4(55), 110-113. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17231744