MINIMIZING EXPORT SUBSIDIES: ADHERING TO WTO RULES AND THE SCM AGREEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11408283Keywords:
WTO, subsidy, non-market economy, antidumping, countervailing measures, SCM.Abstract
This article discusses the importance of minimizing export subsidies to promote fair competition in international trade. It explores how reducing these subsidies can lead to a more level playing field, encourage innovation, and support sustainable economic growth. The article also highlights China's experience with state subsidies and their impact on global trade dynamics, particularly in the context of anti-dumping measures and market economy status.
References
European Commission. (2021). Anti-Dumping Investigations. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/trade/trade-policy-and-you/contacts/
World Trade Organization. (2001). Protocol on the Accession of the People's Republic of China (WT/L/432). Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/completeacc_e.htm
Economic Policy Institute. (2016). Potential Job Losses in the EU Due to Granting China Market Economy Status. Retrieved from https://www.epi.org/publications/
Reuters. (2016, December 15). France's Macron Says EU Should Protect Its Markets from Chinese Dumping. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/
BBC News. (2016, December 11). China Pushes for Market Economy Status Amid Anti-Dumping Disputes. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/
Centre for European Studies at Fudan University. (2016). Analysis of China-EU Trade Relations and Market Economy Status. Retrieved from https://www.fudan.edu.cn/en/
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. (2016). Statement on China's WTO Status. Retrieved from https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/
Brookings Institution. (2016). The Economic Impact of Granting China Market Economy Status. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/
