TYPOLOGY OF TYPES OF CORRUPTION AND ITS PHYLOSOPHICAL REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16760648Keywords:
state, responsibility, legal reforms, anti-corruption, criminal law, legal analysis, methodology, theory, social risk, prevention.Abstract
This article analyzes various theoretical approaches and criteria for the classification of corruption, where corruption is categorized based on objects, subjects, levels of authority, and territorial scope. Additionally, corruption is examined in its public and private, domestic and international, economic and political, administrative and business forms, and its impact on social relations is assessed as a systemic phenomenon. Furthermore, the article substantiates the necessity of in-depth study of corruption cases and the importance of their comprehensive classification.
References
Rose-Ackerman, S. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Moscow, 2003, p. 150.
Rottenberg, S. Comment // The Journal of Law and Economics, 1975, Vol. 18.
Musheshe, N. NGO and Mobilization Against Corruption / Africa Leadership Forum. Corruption, Democracy and Human Rights in East and Central Africa. Entebbe, Republic of Uganda, December 12–14, 1994. Ibadan, pp. 133–134.
Scott, J.C. Comparative Political Corruption. New York, 1972, p. 88.
Proyava, S.M. Economization of Corruption. Counteraction Mechanism: Monograph. Moscow, 2008, pp. 32–33.
Akhmedov, I. Corruption Lawlessness // Monitor, April 10, 2003, No. 14.
Beken, T.V. A European View on the Russian Draft Federal Law “On the Fundamentals of Anti-Corruption Policy” // State and Law, 2002, No. 6, p. 118.
Naumov, Yu.G. Corruption and Society: Theoretical-Economic and Applied Research: Monograph. Vladimir, 2007, p. 44.
