STRUCTURED VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION FOR ACADEMIC SUCCESS: A STUDY ON TRADITIONAL METHODS

Authors

  • Rasulbek Ergashev a professor at Turan International University, Namangan Uzbekistan; an independent researcher at Namangan State foreign languages institute, Namangan, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14015886

Keywords:

academic vocabulary, vocabulary acquisition, traditional methods, structured learning, teacher-centered approach, peer instruction, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This study examines the impact of traditional vocabulary instruction methods on academic vocabulary acquisition among master’s-level English teachers in Uzbekistan. Conducted over an eight-week period with 20 participants, the research utilized the Academic Word List (AWL) and traditional methods, including peer instruction, flashcards, and structured practice, to introduce 25 words per session. Assessments, including pre-tests, weekly evaluations, and post-tests, revealed notable improvements in vocabulary retention and usage. Participant feedback highlighted the predictability and clarity of structured learning, with an emphasis on vocabulary relevant to their professional and academic development. Findings suggest that traditional methods remain effective in non-digital, teacher-centered environments but could benefit from occasional integration of interactive activities. This study underscores the importance of structured vocabulary instruction in academic settings and offers insights into enhancing learner engagement and retention.

References

Amirian, S. M. R., & Heshmatifar, Z. (2013). A survey on vocabulary learning strategies: A case of Iranian EFL university students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3), 636-644. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.3.636-644

Browne, C. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.65

Folse, K. S. (2004). Vocabulary Myths: Applying Second Language Research to Classroom Teaching. University of Michigan Press.

Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01355.x

Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.1

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Teng, F. (2015). Assessing the relationship between vocabulary learning strategy use and vocabulary knowledge. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 49, 39-65.

Webb, S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

Ergashev, R. (2024). STRUCTURED VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION FOR ACADEMIC SUCCESS: A STUDY ON TRADITIONAL METHODS. Международная конференция академических наук, 3(10), 188-193. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14015886