MODERN FORMS OF SIMPLIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17197247Keywords:
Administrative law; simplification; e-government; due process; Uzbekistan; comparative law; digital transformationAbstract
The simplification of administrative procedures has become one of the defining features of contemporary public governance. In the context of globalization, digitalization, and rising demands for efficiency, states face increasing pressure to reduce bureaucratic barriers while ensuring the protection of citizens’ rights. This article examines the modern forms of simplification of administrative procedures through a comparative legal analysis, with a particular focus on European Union practice, OECD standards, Asian innovations, and the Uzbek national strategy. It explores the conceptual foundations of simplification, identifies key instruments such as e-government platforms, one-stop services, and “silence is consent” mechanisms, and assesses their legal and institutional implications. The study argues that simplification should not undermine due process guarantees but must be balanced with principles of transparency, legal certainty, and accountability. The article concludes by proposing recommendations for improving the legal framework of administrative procedures in Uzbekistan, aligning them with international best practices and digital transformation strategies.
References
Auby, J. B. (2014). Administrative Law and Globalization. Springer.
Caranta, R., & Gerbrandy, A. (Eds.). (2020). EU Administrative Law and Policy. Edward Elgar.
Craig, P. (2012). EU Administrative Law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Fiorina, M. (1982). Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. Yale University Press.
Mashaw, J. L. (2018). Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. Yale University Press.
Moon, M. J. (2002). The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.
OECD. (2012). Recommendation of the Council on Regulatory Policy and Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2020). Administrative Simplification and Digital Government. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Radaelli, C. (2007). Whither Better Regulation for the Lisbon Agenda? Journal of European Public Policy, 14(2), 190–207.
Rustambekov, I. (2021). Administrative Procedure Reform in Uzbekistan: Between Tradition and Digital Transformation. Central Asian Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), 45–62.
UN DESA. (2022). United Nations E-Government Survey 2022: The Future of Digital Government. New York: United Nations.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.
Zouridis, S., van Eck, M., & Bovens, M. (2020). Automated Decision-Making in the Public Sector: Accountability, Transparency and Public Trust. Information Polity, 25(4), 491–506.
World Bank. (2021). Doing Business Report 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. Washington, DC.
