Перейти к главному меню навигации Перейти к основному контенту Перейти к нижнему колонтитулу сайта

Том 5 № 2 (2026)
Science and innovation in the education system

Статьи

IMPACT OF AI-ASSISTED SUGGESTIONS ON SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY IN L2 ACADEMIC WRITING

Опубликован 2026-02-16

  • Jasmina Ashirova Amageldi qizi

Jasmina Ashirova Amageldi qizi
Graduate student at Webster University

Аннотация

This study examines the impact of AI-assisted suggestions on syntactic complexity in second language (L2) academic writing. With the increasing use of artificial intelligence tools in language education, AI-based writing assistants are becoming an integral part of students’ writing processes. This research focuses on how AI-generated syntactic suggestions influence sentence structure, clause combination, and overall syntactic sophistication in L2 student essays.

Ключевые слова

AI-assisted suggestions; syntactic complexity; L2 academic writing; automated feedback; sentence structure; academic essays

PDF

Библиографические ссылки

  1. Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.
  2. Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Predicting syntactic proficiency in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 115–135.
  3. Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. English Language Teaching Journal, 63(2), 97–107.
  4. Ergasheva, S. B., Djalolovna, Y. L., & Norova, F. F. (2022). The principles of using computer technologies in the formation and development of students' language skills. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 13.
  5. Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
  6. Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101.
  7. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of L2 learners. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619.
  8. Li, J. (2020). Automated writing evaluation and feedback in ESL writing classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, 100734.
  9. Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36–62.
  10. Ranalli, J. (2021). Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 1–25.
  11. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.
  12. Tuxtayevich, K. I., Ahmatovna, P. S., Turgunbayevna, M. N., Rasulovna, R. M., Qizi, T. F. R., & Qizi, Y. N. A. (2024). Different Approaches to Enhance Critical Thinking in Digital Education. SPAST Reports, 1(7).
  13. Ware, P. (2018). Feedback that promotes learner autonomy in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 1–15.
  14. Yoon, S. Y., & Polio, C. (2017). The linguistic development of ESL students through revision. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 1–17.
  15. Zhang, Z. (2017). Student engagement with automated feedback in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 220–244.