NATIONAL-CULTURAL FEATURES OF LEXICAL UNITS FORMED ON THE BASIS OF THE “TOURISM” CONCEPT

Authors

  • Hilola Xoldorova Namangan state university 3 grade basic doctoral student

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Keywords:

concept, tourism, conceptual-associative field, national-cultural specificity, cognitive linguistics, linguoculturology, Uzbek language, English language.

Abstract

This article examines the national-cultural specificity of lexical units that constitute the conceptual-associative field of the concept “Tourism” in the Uzbek and English languages. Adopting a cognitive-linguistic and comparative-associative approach, the study demonstrates that the internal structure of the concept, although sharing a common semantic core in both languages, is shaped by distinct historical, social and cultural experiences of the two linguo-cultural communities. The findings show that in the Uzbek linguistic consciousness the concept “Tourism” is organised around a value-oriented, heritage-centred model, whereas in the English linguistic consciousness it is organised around a process- and experience-oriented model.

References

1. Позднякова Е.М. Рец. на кн.: Кубрякова Е.С. Язык и знание: на пути получения знаний о языке: части речи с когнитивной точки зрения. Роль языка в познании мира. – М., 2004 // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. – 2004. – № 1. – С. 182–184.

2. Begmatov E. Antroponimlar – antropotsentrik tadqiq obyekti // Oʻzbek tili va adabiyoti. – Toshkent, 2013. – № 3. – B. 35–39.

3. Richards, G. Cultural Tourism. (2018). Cultural Tourism: A Review of Recent Research and Trends. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 36, 12–21.

4. Safarov Sh. Kognitiv tilshunoslik. Toshkent: Fan. 2008

5.Crystal, D. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. (2010). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Xoldorova , H. (2026). NATIONAL-CULTURAL FEATURES OF LEXICAL UNITS FORMED ON THE BASIS OF THE “TOURISM” CONCEPT. Инновационные исследования в науке, 5(8), 163-166. https://doi.org/10.5281/