LEGAL PROBLEMS OF JUDICIAL RECOVERY OF DAMAGE CAUSED BY ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES

Authors

  • Elbek Tursunkulov 2nd-year student of the Faculty of Law at the “TIIAME” National Research University
  • Anvar Abdukhakimov 2nd-year student of the Faculty of Law at the “TIIAME” National Research University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Keywords:

environmental offence, damage compensation, civil liability, burden of proof, standing to sue, environmental liability, Uzbekistan.

Abstract

This article examines the legal problems that arise when damage caused by environmental offences is recovered through the courts of the Republic of Uzbekistan. It analyses the relationship between the general civil-law principle of full compensation of harm and the specific features of environmental damage, in particular the difficulty of quantifying harm to natural resources, the allocation of the burden of proof, standing to sue, and the coordination between administrative liability and civil recovery. The mechanisms of the European Union and comparative practice on environmental liability are examined for contrast. The study employs formal-legal, comparative-legal and systemic-functional methods together with elements of legal modelling.

References

1. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023, April 30). Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan (amended edition). LexUZ. https://lex.uz/docs/-6445145

2. Republic of Uzbekistan. (1995, December 21). Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (Part One). LexUZ. https://lex.uz/docs/-111189

3. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2013, December 27). Law “On Ecological Control” (No. O'RQ-363). LexUZ. https://lex.uz/docs/-2304953

4. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2021, March 15). Law “On Ecological Audit” (No. O'RQ-678). LexUZ. https://lex.uz/docs/-5331133

5. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2018, January 25). Code of Administrative Court Proceedings of the Republic of Uzbekistan. LexUZ. https://lex.uz/docs/-3527353

6. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025, July 7). Law “On Limiting Greenhouse Gas Emissions” (No. O'RQ-1073). LexUZ. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-7616051

7. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2004). Directive 2004/35/EC on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. EUR-Lex.

8. Faure, M. G. (2009). Environmental liability. In M. Faure (Ed.), Tort Law and Economics (Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 2nd ed.). Edward Elgar. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1503405

9. Kindji, K. and Faure, M. (2019). Assessing reparation of environmental damage by the ICJ: A lost opportunity? Questions of International Law, Zoom-in 58. https://www.qil-qdi.org/assessing-reparation-of-environmental-damage-by-the-icj-a-lost-opportunity/

10. Ministry of Ecology, Environmental Protection and Climate Change of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025, June 27). More than 3,500 raids conducted by the State Environmental Control Inspectorate. Government Portal of the Republic of Uzbekistan. https://gov.uz/en/eco/news/view/64334

Downloads

Published

2026-08-13

How to Cite

Tursunkulov, E., & Abdukhakimov, A. (2026). LEGAL PROBLEMS OF JUDICIAL RECOVERY OF DAMAGE CAUSED BY ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES. Academic Research in Modern Science, 5(27), 90-100. https://doi.org/10.5281/