Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024)
Models and methods in modern science

Статьи

FUNCTIONAL-SEMANTIC FEATURES OF GRADATION IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES.

Published 2024-03-31

  • Ergashev Muhammadjon
    • ,
  • Aliqo’zoyeva Nigoraxon Baxromjon qizi

Ergashev Muhammadjon
PhD, Docent Kokand State Pedagogical Institute, Uzbekistan

Aliqo’zoyeva Nigoraxon Baxromjon qizi
Master student of Foreign Language and Literature, Kokand State Pedagogical Institute, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article deals with the problems of lexicology and stylistics in linguistics which studies the graduonimic words which are one of the important field of the language. It is filed that  the degree of the gradation related with the corresponding factor on the scale, and for that reason categorical precise gradational standards in the language. The common degree or norm of a person a commonly has no extraordinary potential of determination. This function is stated by way of many researchers. It is really worth noting that the indications of the highlighted organizations differ, first of all, in the diploma of graduality of the sign, that is, they occupy extraordinary factors of the scale, growing and reducing in relation to the center factor (norm).

Keywords

gradation, scale, statistic indicators, gradual concepts, precise point, beginning point, ending point, conjuctions

PDF

References

  1. Arutyunova, N.D. Types of linguistic values: Assessment. Event. Fact.– M.: Nauka, 1988.– 341 p.
  2. Chervenkova I.V. General adverbial indicators of the sign of the sign (in the modern Rusakom Literary Language): Author of the dissertation of the candidate of philological sciences: 10.02.01 / Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Institute of the Russian Language.– M., 1975.– 26 p.
  3. Devkin V.D. About the Gradual Dictionary // The phraseological system of the language.– Issue 4.– Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical Institute. 1978.– P. 54–62. Dybo, A.V. Semantic reconstruction in Altaic etymology. Somatic terms (shoulder girdle).– M.: Gnosis, 1995.– 385 p
  4. Shegal, E.I. Gradation in lexical semantics: a training manual for a special course.– Kuibyshev: Kuibyshev State Pedagogical Institute, 1990.– 96 p.
  5. www.thecontentauthority.com
  6. Haydarova, G. (2024). ALISHER NAVOIY AN’ANALARI VA XX ASR O ‘ZBEK G ‘AZALIYOTI. Alisher Navo'i and 21 st century, 1(1).
  7. Haydarova, G., & Haydaraliyeva, R. (2024). FEATURES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF KUNTUGMISH DOSTON. Академические исследования в современной науке, 3(1), 32-36.
  8. Haydarova, G. (2024). ALISHER NAVOIY AN’ANALARI VA XX ASR O ‘ZBEK G ‘AZALIYOTI. Alisher Navo'i and 21 st century, 1(1).
  9. Бобоев, Ф. С. (2015). Ўзбекистон МДА нинга йрим фондлари–Ўзбекистон ССР да совет режимига карши қуролли ҳаракат тарихини ёритишда муҳим манба. Илмий хабарнома. Андижон, (2), 64-67.
  10. Abdulhamidov, S. (2023). BASIC PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURE FOR STUDYING CAUSATIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN MODERN LINGUISTICS. Наука и технология в современном мире, 2(19), 19-22.
  11. Abdulhamidov, S. (2023). CAUSATIVITY FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE LINGUOCOGNITIVE ASPECT. Инновационные исследования в современном мире: теория и практика, 2(23), 8-11.
  12. Xusnitdin o’g’li, S. A. (2023). ISSUES OF CREATING A LINGUISTIC IMAGE OF THE WORLD. Gospodarka i Innowacje., 37, 44-46.
  13. Xusnitdin o’g’li, S. A. (2022). LEXICAL AND SEMANTICAL MEANING OF CAUSATIVE VERBS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH. Open Access Repository, 8(11), 309-311.
  14. Xusnitdin o’g’li, S. A. (2022). SEMANTIC INTERPRETATION OF CAUSATIVITY IN LINGUISTICS. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(11), 546-549.
  15. Khusniddin o’g’li, A. S. (2022). Cognitive Formats of Knowledge as an Object of Linguistic Studies. International Journal of Formal Education, 1(6), 43-48.